Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Keywords
1. Introduction
Lavandula officinalis Chaix. (synonyms: L. angustifolia Mill.; L. vera DC.){family: Labiatae} is an evergreen bushy shrub with straight, woody branches, the lower of which are leafless, putting out numerous herbaceous stems to a height of about 1 meter [1-3]. The leaves are opposite, long, narrow, lanceolate and light grayish-green with a downy appearance. There is an inflorescence at the end of each slender stem where the densely packed layers of flowers seem to be in whorls [1].
The plant is indigenous to Southern Europe and is sometimes found growing wild in the Mediterranean area between the coast and the lower mountain slopes [1, 2]. It is cultivated throughout Europe [1] as well as in different parts of Iran.
Flowers of the plant have carminative, antispasmodic, antidepressant, antirheumatic, antiseptic and tonic properties [1, 2] and are indicated in flatulent dyspepsia, colic and depressive headache. Essential oil of the flowers is rubefacient and is used topically in rheumatic pain [2].
The composition of the essential oil of the plant growing in Italy [4], Russia [5] and other parts of the world has been reported, but, as the volatile oil of the plant is well established to be the major active constituent and also is well known to be available in larger quantities in the flowers, and since, in recent years the plant is widely cultivated in Isfahan and the climate as well as the soil conditions in Isfahan are different from those of the original habitat, and on the other hand, as no previous investigation of flower essential oil constituents of the cultivated plant in Isfahan, Iran, has been carried out, therefore, in the present study the quantity as well as the quality of the volatile oil obtained from flowers of the cultivated plant in Isfahan is determined.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Plant material
Flowers of the plant cultivated in standard conditions were obtained from the "Medicinal Plants Section" of the Research Center of Natural Resources-Jihad Sazandeghee of Isfahan, Iran. The plant was identified by the Botany Department of the Faculty of Sciences at the Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran. Voucher specimens of the flowering plant (No.1484) were deposited in the Herbarium of the Pharmacognosy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan, Iran.
2.2. Essential oil preparation
The air-dried flowers were grossly pulverized and the essential oil fraction was isolated after hydro-distillation for 4 h using the apparatus according to the British Pharmacopoeia [6].
2.3. TLC analysis
The components were tentatively identified on silica gel 60 GF thin layer plates using some authentic samples for comparison. The mobile phase was toluene-ethyl acetate (93:7) and characterization of the separated components was by vanillin-sulfuric acid reagent and Rf values [7]. The above stationary phase was also used for the identification of camphor; the mobile phase was dichloromethane. After development, the plates were treated with phosphomolybdic acid reagent and heated for 5 min. at 100 °C, sprayed with a solution of 0.5 g potassium permanganate in 5 ml concentrated sulfuric acid, and heated again for 5 min. at 100 °C, camphor appeared as a dark blue spot [8].
2.4. GC-MS analysis
A Finnigan-Mat Incos 50 mass spectrometer equipped with a Data General computer, coupled directly with a Varian 3400 gas chromatograph, was used for the identification and structure elucidation of the components. The column was a 25 m x 0.25 mm i.d capillary DB-1, film thickness: 0.25 μm; carrier gas He, flow rate 1.5 ml/min, temperature program: 60-280 °C at 5 °C/min; mass spectra: electronic impact, ionization potential 70 eV, ion source temperature 180 °C, resolution 1000, and mass range 35-450.
Identification of the constituents was based on computer matching of the mass spectra against the library spectra built up from pure substances and components of known essential oils, comparison of their mass spectra with the literature data [9, 10], comparison of their calculated retention indices with those of the authentic reference compounds on non polar capillary columns [11], interpreting their fragmentation pattern and chromatography on silica gel plates along with some authentic samples.
Dried flowers of L. officinalis afforded on hydro-distillation a limpid, yellow-greenish essential oil (1.97 ml/100 g), lighter than water and having the following physical properties: d25: 0.86, η25: 1.461. Twelve components, representing 94.8 % of the essential oil, were identified (Table 1). The monoterpenoid fraction constitutes 88.6% of the oil with the main components linalool (34.1%), 1,8-cineole (18.5%), borneole (14.5%) and camphor (10.2%). Percentage of the identified sesquiterpenes and sesquiter-penoid components was relatively low (6.2%). The main components of this fraction in the examined flowers are α-bisabolol (3%) and (Z)-β-farnesene (2.2%). Other identified components of this fraction are α-chamigrene and caryophyllene oxide. Occurrence of caryophyllene oxide in the flowers of the same plant growing elsewhere has been reported [3]. Flowers of the same plant are reported to produce 1 to 3% essential oil, containing mainly monoterpenes, the most important component of which is linalyl acetate (30-55%), linalool (20-35%), β-ocimene, cineole (1,8-cineole), camphor, and also the sesquitepene caryophyllene oxide [3]. On the other hand, samples of essential oils of the same plant grown in the General Botanic Garden in Russia were mentioned to contain linalool (4.7-22%), linalyl acetate (15-22%), and terpinen-4-ol (7-21%) as the major components [5]. Comparing our results with the above mentioned reports, it can be concluded that the amount of linalyl acetate in our analyzed oil is relatively lower. This difference may be attributed to the different soils and especially climatic conditions. Soils in Europe are enriched with humus [12] but soils in Isfahan are light or heavy and are not enriched with humus. Temperature, rainfall, and day-length (including the quality of light) are among the important climatic factors which affect the plant growth and development and often the nature and quantity of secondary metabolites [12].
Table 1. Composition of the essential oil of Lavandula officinalis flowers.
Name of constituents |
RI* |
Percentage |
Identification |
|
|
|
methods |
1,8-Cineole |
1029 |
18.5 |
GC-MS, RI*, TLC |
Linalool |
1099 |
34.1 |
GC-MS, RI, TLC |
Camphor |
1142 |
10.2 |
GC-MS, RI, TLC |
Borneol |
1166 |
14.5 |
GC-MS, RI, TLC |
Terpinen-4-ol |
1175 |
4.5 |
GC-MS, RI |
α-Terpineol |
1185 |
2.2 |
GC-MS, RI |
Linalyl acetate |
1253 |
3.7 |
GC-MS, RI, TLC |
Thymol |
1287 |
0.9 |
GC-MS, RI |
(Z)-β-Farnesene |
1442 |
2.2 |
GC-MS, RI |
α-Chamigrene |
1505 |
0.5 |
GC-MS, RI |
Caryophyllene oxide |
1579 |
0.5 |
GC-MS, RI |
α-Bisabolol |
1682 |
3.0 |
GC-MS, RI, TLC |
Grouped constituents: |
|
|
|
Oxygen containing monoterpenoids |
|
88.6 |
|
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons |
|
2.7 |
|
Oxygen containing sesquiterpenoids |
3.5 |
|
|
Total |
|
94.8 |
|
* RI=Retention index |
|
|
|
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Mr. Nowroozi and Mr. Bagherzadeh (from the Medicinal Plants Section of the Research Centre of Natural Resources of Jihad Sazandeghee of Isfahan) for their help in offering the standard plant material.